This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Khedkar, N. Articles by Lakier, J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Role of Duplex Imaging in Intermnediate Category Ventilation Peffusion Scans

Experience of a Conmmnunity Hospital

Division of Nuclear Medicine Department of Medicine, Lutheran General Hospital, Park Ridge, Illinois; Vascular Laboratory, Departmernt of Medicine, Lutheran General Hospital, 1775 Dempster St, Park Ridge, IL 60068-1174.

Theresa Gavilan-Agpoon, BS, CNMT

Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medicine, Lutheran General Hospital, Park Ridge, Illinois.

Roseann Redden, RDMS

Vascular Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Lutheran General Hospital, Park Ridge, Illinois.

Patrick Peller, MD

Charles Martinez, MD

Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medicine, Lutheran General Hospital, Park Ridge, Illinois.

Jeffrey Lakier, MD

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Lutheran General Hospital, Park Ridge, Illinois.

Clinical diagnosis of pulmonary embolus (PE) is difficult. Pulmonary angiography is still the gold standard for diagnosing PE, and ventilation perfusion (VQ) lung scans are used as a screening test. With normal VQ scans, PE can be ruled out. High probability VQ scans have high positive accuracy. The authors conducted a retrospective analysis of 45 patients who underwent intermediate VQ scans. Of the 45 patients who had intermediate VQ scans performed, 37 (82%) had venous duplex imaging (VDI) conducted, with 7 found to be positive for deep vein thrombosis. Of the 45 patients who had intermediate VQ scans performed, 12 (27%) had pulmonary angiograms performed, 7 (58%) of which were positive for PE. Six of these seven patients also had VDI conducted, all of which were negative. In total, of the 22 patients found to have a clinical discharge diagnosis of PE, 13 had either VDI studies or pulmonary angiographies positive for PE. These results indicate that a positive VDI study substantiates a diagnosis of PE. However, negative VDI study does not rule out pulmonary embolus.

Key Words: pulmonary embolism • venous duplex imaging

Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, Vol. 14, No. 3, 113-115 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/875647939801400303


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?