Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kawamura, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Calton, S. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Ultrasound Physics and Instrumentation in Clinical Practice and Application

An ARDMS Task Survey

Diane M. Kawamura, PhD, RT(R), RDMS

Kari E. Boyce, PhD, RDMS, RDCS

Kirk K. Shung, PhD

Sharon S. Calton, MEd, RT(R), RDMS

American Registry of Diagnostic Medical Sonographers.

The American Registry of Diagnostic Medical Sonographers administers certification examinations in various specialty areas. To ensure that these examinations reflect the application of these principles and instrumentation to clinical practice, the American Registry of Diagnostic Medical Sonographers regularly surveys sonographers to determine current practice.

The Ultrasound Physics and Instrumentation Examination Development Task Force conducted a task analysis survey of a random sample of 7,000 registered and unregistered sonographers. The ultrasound physics and instrumentation examination content outline was revised to reflect changes in practice as evident from the survey results. This revision was also reviewed by scientists, authors, lecturers, and sonography educators. Evaluation also included assessing the feasibility of the content outline for use as an educational curriculum outline for ultrasound physics and instrumentation courses and reviewing current textbooks and other resources to ensure availability of information in each outline content area.

The most notable change is the broad use of electronic and Doppler instrumentation by sonographers. As a result, the transducer, instrumentation, and Doppler sections of the outline have been significantly revised, while reference to mechanical transducers have been reduced and static scanners eliminated. Increased use of digital and semidigital image archive systems provided the rationale to expand the image storage and display portion of the outline. The artifacts section has been reorganized to reflect the way each artifact appears within an image. Quality assurance has been expanded to include Doppler equipment and statistical indices. Lastly, the section on bioeffects and safety now includes the acoustic output labeling standards, thermal and mechanical indices.

Key Words: ARDMS • certification examinations • physics and instrumentation • content outline

Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, Vol. 16, No. 1, 1-13 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/875647930001600101


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?