Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weigang, B.
Right arrow Articles by Schafer, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Methods and Effects of Transducer Degradation on Image Quality and the Clinical Efficacy of Diagnostic Sonography

Beate Weigang, BSc

G. W. Moore, BSc, MA

James Gessert, BSc

William H. Phillips, BSc, MA

Mark Schafer, PhD

In diagnostic ultrasound examinations, transducer "health" is key to diagnostic efficacy. It is known that individual transducer element integrity within an array is central to overall probe performance and over time, with normal use, elements can cease working or lose sensitivity, leading to a potentially negative impact on the clinical efficacy of the ultrasound examination. Investigating this issue, the authors evaluated transducers with selected elements disabled compared to fully functioning arrays, examined how dead elements affected ultrasound beams, acoustic parameters, flow phantom/tissue phantom results as well as human imaging. Results: As few as 2 consecutive dead elements can materially impact the beam profile; four or more can significantly reduce resolution and penetration, increase the noise floor, and cause Doppler peak velocity errors, flow ambiguity and spectral broadening. Tissue phantoms proved to be equivocal in spotting defective elements. Conclusion: array heath is critical to high-quality, efficacious ultrasound studies and the potential for misdiagnosis increases as array elements degrade.

Key Words: ultrasound transducers • quality assurance • image quality • Doppler • effects and mechanisms

Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, Vol. 19, No. 1, 3-13 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/8756479302239545


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?