Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thoirs, K.
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, Vol. 23, No. 5, 255-262 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/8756479307306110


Reviews

Systematic Review of Sonographic Measurements of the Ulnar Nerve at the Elbow

Kerry Thoirs, PHD, MMED RAD, DMU, AMS

School of Health Sciences (City East Campus), University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, kerry.thoirs{at}unisa.edu.au

Marie A. Williams, PHD, GRAD CERT PHYSIO, BAAPPSC

School of Health Sciences (City East Campus), University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia

Maureen Phillips, MHEALTH, DCR R, DMU, AMS

School of Health Sciences (City East Campus), University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia

A systematic review was performed to identify studies reporting summary data (mean, standard deviation) of sonographic cross-sectional measurements of the ulnar nerve at the elbow. Comparisons of measurements were performed to determine whether statistical differences existed between groups of individuals symptomatic and asymptomatic of ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow (UNE). Across the four studies meeting the selection criteria of the search, five sample groups were identified and compared: three asymptomatic of UNE and two symptomatic of UNE. There were significant differences between measurements of people with and without UNE (P < .0001—.041). Significant differences also existed between the two symptomatic populations (P < .0001—.0062) and between the three asymptomatic populations (P < .0001—.41). This systematic review demonstrates that significant differences exist between sonographic measurements of ulnar nerve dimension between people with and without UNE, confirming that these measurements are potential discriminators of UNE. The demonstration of significant differences between measurements of ulnar nerve size within sample populations with similar symptomatic status suggests that further studies are required to confirm the effect of ulnar nerve pathologies, measurement protocols, and anthropometric factors.

Key Words: elbow • measurements • ulnar nerve • sonography


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?